| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
David Wynne-Griffiths Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:37 pm Post subject: Re: If you knew you had a future Judge, how would it impact |
|
|
| Quote: |
On Jun 26, 1:34 am, davidwg <davi...@zetnet.co.uk> wrote:
It is curious that theists have such a hang up about what they call
sin which in many cases are harmless but pleasurable activities they
wish to ban because they hate the idea that people might enjoy them.
They think that only they have morality despite the fact that in
general atheists are more law abiding and less likely to break the law
than theists.
Then there is no such thing as sexual IMmorality ? When did
that change from being immoral ? How is it harmless ?
|
Perhaps even more curious is the obvious hang up about sex! What
constitutes sexual immorality and what is harmful about consensual sex
between adults in private?
What are these allegedly absolute moral laws? and who or what proclaimed them?
--
********
DavidWG
******** |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Alwyn Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:48 pm Post subject: Re: If you knew you had a future Judge, how would it impact |
|
|
In article
<0ed545c2-66db-48ed-aa07-c13c89fd5b47@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
"IlBeBauck@gmail.com" <IlBeBauck@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
On Jun 25, 4:29 pm, Ian Smith <news0807REMOVEC...@orrery.e4ward.com
wrote:
Why should it? Why would you have an impression that an atheist
would be any less moral than a theist? Don't forget that the
religious simply superimpose a set of mythical, superstitious, false
morals instead of rationally derived morals.
REPLY: Because they uphold Moral Relativism . Why should an atheist
force himself to become absolutely moral when he doesnt believe in
absolute moral laws ?
|
If you make your moral judgments with reference to some god or other,
then you too asre a moral relativist; your morality is relative to your
god.
Plato, Aristotle and Kant, on the other hand, advocated truly absolute
moral principles that were not dependent on any god.
Alwyn |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
sandi Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 7:16 pm Post subject: Re: If you knew you had a future Judge, how would it impact |
|
|
On Jun 25, 1:43 pm, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <IlBeBa...@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
REPLY: Yes, I have compelling evidence for a personal moral Creator
and Judge...
|
Sure you do, but you have also asserted that humans and dinosaurs
actually lived together in past history, which provides us all with
compelling evidence that you're completely full of shit
Do you ever intend to seek help with your delusions?
Sandy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Ian Smith Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:24 pm Post subject: Re: If you knew you had a future Judge, how would it impact |
|
|
mark wrote:
| Quote: |
X-No-Archive: yes
IlBeBauck@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 26, 1:34 am, davidwg <davi...@zetnet.co.uk> wrote:
It is curious that theists have such a hang up about what they call
sin which in many cases are harmless but pleasurable activities they
wish to ban because they hate the idea that people might enjoy them.
They think that only they have morality despite the fact that in
general atheists are more law abiding and less likely to break the
law than theists.
REPLY: Then there is no such thing as sexual IMmorality ? When did
that change from being immoral ? How is it harmless ?
.....maybe YOU could explain how morality becomes involved in sexual
relations between consenting adults....?
We can discuss the meaning and subsequent impact of the word " harmless"
after....
[..indeed, we could discuss the meaning of "moral" as well but I'm not sure
your up to that level of comprehension just yet..]
|
Well, lets try him out Mark:
Dave, I have a relatively (pun again!) good idea of what constitutes
moral behaviour.
I believe that the aids epidemic in Africa is a dreadful thing -
leaving women (and men for that matter) widowed and children
orphaned and starving. I support the UN's efforts to deliver relief
to these people.
Christians (Roman Catholics and US evangelicals) have repeatedly
obstructed these efforts, blocking funding for any organisation that
doesn't follow an "exclusively abstinence based" approach i.e. they
cannot therefore provide education on the use of condoms and they
cannot distribute condoms.
We know that condoms work, and work well - well enough to be able to
stop an aids epidemic in time. We know that abstinence based
programmes don't work (I repeat, for the hard of thinking: DO NOT
WORK). They don't work in the US and they don't work in Africa - fact.
So, the Christians are actively killing people every day with their
blocking of this help. I call this immoral. Plain and simple, clear
cut, immoral.
regards, Ian |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Ian Smith Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:26 pm Post subject: Re: If you knew you had a future Judge, how would it impact |
|
|
IlBeBauck@gmail.com wrote:
| Quote: |
Why should it? Why would you have an impression that an atheist
would be any less moral than a theist? Don't forget that the
religious simply superimpose a set of mythical, superstitious, false
morals instead of rationally derived morals.
REPLY: Because they uphold Moral Relativism . Why should an atheist
force himself to become absolutely moral when he doesnt believe in
absolute moral laws ?
|
He doesn't. He uses a system of rationally derived morals and
rejects your "absolute morals" as superstition and mythology and I
ask again...
Why would you have an impression that an atheist would be any less
moral than a theist? Don't forget that the religious simply
superimpose a set of mythical, superstitious, false morals instead
of rationally derived morals.
regards, Ian |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Dr.Hal0nf1r£$ Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 1:15 am Post subject: Re: If you knew you had a future Judge, how would it impact |
|
|
Ian Smith wrote:
| Quote: |
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:26:19 +0100, IlBeBauck@gmail.com
IlBeBauck@gmail.com> wrote:
n.
Im
not asking anyone to hold thier breathe, and the question remains :
If you knew there were a final Judge, how would that impact your
life ?
It wouldn't - at all.
Why should it? Why would you have an impression that an atheist
would be any less moral than a theist? Don't forget that the
religious simply superimpose a set of mythical, superstitious, false
morals instead of rationally derived morals.
regards, Ian
REPLY: Because they uphold Moral Relativism . Why should an atheist
force himself to become absolutely moral when he doesnt believe in
absolute moral laws ?
He doesn't. He uses a system of rationally derived morals and rejects
your "absolute morals" as superstition and mythology and I ask
again...
Why would you have an impression that an atheist would be any less
moral than a theist? Don't forget that the religious simply
superimpose a set of mythical, superstitious, false morals instead of
rationally derived morals.
regards, Ian
|
Dimwit has enough evidence to cause *him* to believe: Under normal
circumstances such evidence would be something as little as :
"The Bible says if you throw yourself down from a high place you could die;
and that's correct: So if the Bible is correct there it must be correct
everywhere else, yes?"
Dimwit instantly sees the light, switches it off to save energy, and is
converted.
So you'd imagine that converting away from Xianity would also be as simple:
But no - When he'd been converted they told him
"People will tell you that it's a load of rubbish; but if you listen to them
you'll go to Hell. Everything else is wrong and evil and Xianity is right:
Unless you believe that with your whole mind, heart, and soul, you'll be
sent to Hell. The Xian way is the only true way and you must believe it
despite what any1 else says or you'll go to hell like every non-Xian will."
So he's trapped and suckered.
--
http://www.kustomkomputa.co.uk
Personalised Desktop Computers |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Dr.Hal0nf1r£$ Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 1:19 am Post subject: Re: If you knew you had a future Judge, how would it impact |
|
|
Ian Smith wrote:
| Quote: |
mark wrote:
X-No-Archive: yes
IlBeBauck@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 26, 1:34 am, davidwg <davi...@zetnet.co.uk> wrote:
It is curious that theists have such a hang up about what they call
sin which in many cases are harmless but pleasurable activities
they wish to ban because they hate the idea that people might
enjoy them. They think that only they have morality despite the
fact that in general atheists are more law abiding and less
likely to break the law than theists.
REPLY: Then there is no such thing as sexual IMmorality ? When did
that change from being immoral ? How is it harmless ?
.....maybe YOU could explain how morality becomes involved in sexual
relations between consenting adults....?
We can discuss the meaning and subsequent impact of the word "
harmless" after....
[..indeed, we could discuss the meaning of "moral" as well but I'm
not sure your up to that level of comprehension just yet..]
Well, lets try him out Mark:
Dave, I have a relatively (pun again!) good idea of what constitutes
moral behaviour.
I believe that the aids epidemic in Africa is a dreadful thing -
leaving women (and men for that matter) widowed and children
orphaned and starving. I support the UN's efforts to deliver relief
to these people.
Christians (Roman Catholics and US evangelicals) have repeatedly
obstructed these efforts, blocking funding for any organisation that
doesn't follow an "exclusively abstinence based" approach i.e. they
cannot therefore provide education on the use of condoms and they
cannot distribute condoms.
We know that condoms work, and work well - well enough to be able to
stop an aids epidemic in time. We know that abstinence based
programmes don't work (I repeat, for the hard of thinking: DO NOT
WORK). They don't work in the US and they don't work in Africa - fact.
So, the Christians are actively killing people every day with their
blocking of this help. I call this immoral. Plain and simple, clear
cut, immoral.
regards, Ian
|
Dimwit will avoid this post like the plague: Watch this space...
--
http://www.kustomkomputa.co.uk
Personalised Desktop Computers |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
mark Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:53 pm Post subject: Re: If you knew you had a future Judge, how would it impact |
|
|
X-No-Archive: yes
<IlBeBauck@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0ed545c2-66db-48ed-aa07-c13c89fd5b47@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
REPLY: Because they uphold Moral Relativism . Why should an atheist
force himself to become absolutely moral when he doesnt believe in
absolute moral laws ?
Yes. Quite.
Judeo-Christians in US prisons as a percentage of the total
population: 83.761%. Atheists 8-16% of the USA population, but only
0.21% of the prison population.
We can deduce the *sinfullness* of observing strict moral values from
these then...
As a percentage, in the US, more christians are more likely to be more
sinful - and end up in prison - than atheists. Far more. About 400 times
more likely statistically....
Understand that..? 400 times more likely to be sinful as a christian than
an atheist. It's breathtaking...
Some facts for you to get your head around my little poppet..
Facts that run completely contrary (..like many others you make) to your
assertions about atheists......
.....the gaps get ever smaller for you to survive in oh wondrous one..
Mark
(thanks to paul grieg on ukph for the stats...) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Alwyn Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 9:31 pm Post subject: Re: If you knew you had a future Judge, how would it impact |
|
|
In article <GeydnbWYx8V2kfjVnZ2dnUVZ8h6dnZ2d@bt.com>,
"mark" <no-onehere@noads.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
Judeo-Christians in US prisons as a percentage of the total
population: 83.761%. Atheists 8-16% of the USA population, but only
0.21% of the prison population.
We can deduce the *sinfullness* of observing strict moral values from
these then...
As a percentage, in the US, more christians are more likely to be more
sinful - and end up in prison - than atheists. Far more. About 400 times
more likely statistically....
Understand that..? 400 times more likely to be sinful as a christian than
an atheist. It's breathtaking...
|
That is a misuse of statistics if I ever saw one!
Assuming that self-declared atheists are at 8% in the general US
population and 0.2% in the prison population, we can say that prison
inmates there are 40 times less likely to declare themselves atheist
than people on the outside. One possible reason why this is so is that
atheists do not get to attend chapel and receive no pastoral care, two
things that may be especially valuable to someone who is cooped up in a
cell all day and every day. Another possibility is that prisoners are
mostly not the kind of people who think about these things and give the
'default' or expected answer when asked about their religion. Yet again,
you could say that atheists are cleverer than average, which makes it
less likely their crimes are detected.
Even with these caveats, this is a good message about atheists, which
should embarrass Dave and his ilk.
Alwyn |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Ian Smith Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 11:01 am Post subject: Re: If you knew you had a future Judge, how would it impact |
|
|
Alwyn wrote:
| Quote: |
In article <GeydnbWYx8V2kfjVnZ2dnUVZ8h6dnZ2d@bt.com>,
"mark" <no-onehere@noads.com> wrote:
Judeo-Christians in US prisons as a percentage of the total
population: 83.761%. Atheists 8-16% of the USA population, but only
0.21% of the prison population.
We can deduce the *sinfullness* of observing strict moral values from
these then...
As a percentage, in the US, more christians are more likely to be more
sinful - and end up in prison - than atheists. Far more. About 400 times
more likely statistically....
Understand that..? 400 times more likely to be sinful as a christian than
an atheist. It's breathtaking...
That is a misuse of statistics if I ever saw one!
Assuming that self-declared atheists are at 8% in the general US
population and 0.2% in the prison population, we can say that prison
inmates there are 40 times less likely to declare themselves atheist
than people on the outside. One possible reason why this is so is that
atheists do not get to attend chapel and receive no pastoral care, two
things that may be especially valuable to someone who is cooped up in a
cell all day and every day. Another possibility is that prisoners are
mostly not the kind of people who think about these things and give the
'default' or expected answer when asked about their religion. Yet again,
you could say that atheists are cleverer than average, which makes it
less likely their crimes are detected.
Even with these caveats, this is a good message about atheists, which
should embarrass Dave and his ilk.
|
The other issue here is that, if you are looking for early parole,
then "finding god" is a useful plus-point for an early release and
getting the pastor's support is a bonus. I could quite easily "find
god" in the same circumstances, for a short time at least!
The figures do however show clearly that theists have no moral
advantage over atheists.
regards, Ian |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
mark Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 11:01 am Post subject: Re: If you knew you had a future Judge, how would it impact |
|
|
X-No-Archive: yes
"Ian Smith" <news0807REMOVECAPS@orrery.e4ward.com> wrote in message
news:5OCdnScF9cl5ZvjVRVnygQA@posted.plusnet...
| Quote: |
Alwyn wrote:
In article <GeydnbWYx8V2kfjVnZ2dnUVZ8h6dnZ2d@bt.com>,
"mark" <no-onehere@noads.com> wrote:
Judeo-Christians in US prisons as a percentage of the total
population: 83.761%. Atheists 8-16% of the USA population, but only
0.21% of the prison population.
We can deduce the *sinfullness* of observing strict moral values from
these then...
As a percentage, in the US, more christians are more likely to be more
sinful - and end up in prison - than atheists. Far more. About 400
times more likely statistically....
Understand that..? 400 times more likely to be sinful as a christian
than an atheist. It's breathtaking...
That is a misuse of statistics if I ever saw one!
|
)
shame poor old dilv couldn't work that out....
| Quote: |
Assuming that self-declared atheists are at 8% in the general US
population and 0.2% in the prison population, we can say that prison
inmates there are 40 times less likely to declare themselves atheist than
people on the outside. One possible reason why this is so is that
atheists do not get to attend chapel and receive no pastoral care, two
things that may be especially valuable to someone who is cooped up in a
cell all day and every day. Another possibility is that prisoners are
mostly not the kind of people who think about these things and give the
'default' or expected answer when asked about their religion. Yet again,
you could say that atheists are cleverer than average, which makes it
less likely their crimes are detected.
Even with these caveats, this is a good message about atheists, which
should embarrass Dave and his ilk.
The other issue here is that, if you are looking for early parole, then
"finding god" is a useful plus-point for an early release and getting the
pastor's support is a bonus. I could quite easily "find god" in the same
circumstances, for a short time at least!
|
Is there, anecdotal or otherwise, any suggestion that US parole boards
actually take that into account.....?
Assuming, of course, the prisoner is *entitled* to apply for parole.
However, of course, the early release or change in sentence doesn't alter or
affect the initial *sinning* or 'loss of morality' by those claiming to be
of some (or none) religious persuasion or other...... unless, of course,
the stats are derived from a prison consensus rather than from records.....
| Quote: |
The figures do however show clearly that theists have no moral advantage
over atheists.
|
Yes. I wouldn't fight to the death over these stats but it really does
suggest, contrary to the dilv assertions that (..as I would guess most of us
in here already know and accept) atheists are no less moral than christians
and it may be, in the US model, that they (atheists) are less likely to
commit crime - not just number wise but as a percentage of both the general,
and prison, population.
Whilst these stats can be interpreted and possibly questioned in many ways
it does seem to me that it may well be a *factual* start point that adds
more probability to the idea of morality from a religious viewpoint than the
dreamed up, subjective, unfounded assertions of dilv and his ilk that
christians possess morality (..or more of it!) whereas atheists don't....
Mark |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
David Wynne-Griffiths Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 4:09 pm Post subject: Re: If you knew you had a future Judge, how would it impact |
|
|
The message <A9SdndeeyPYijfvVRVnyiwA@bt.com>
from "mark" <no-onehere@noads.com> contains these words:
| Quote: |
Whilst these stats can be interpreted and possibly questioned in many ways
it does seem to me that it may well be a *factual* start point that adds
more probability to the idea of morality from a religious viewpoint
than the
dreamed up, subjective, unfounded assertions of dilv and his ilk that
christians possess morality (..or more of it!) whereas atheists don't....
|
Morality is not restricted to theists and atheists if anything tend to
have a higher morality because it is not coloured by the distortions of
religion. A large part of the prison population is illiterate and
composed of people with what are called learning difficulties. On the
whole atheists are more intelligent and better educated than theists and
far less likely to end up in prison.
--
********
DavidWG
******** |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Jeffrey Goldberg Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 5:24 pm Post subject: Re: If you knew you had a future Judge, how would it impact |
|
|
In <A9SdndeeyPYijfvVRVnyiwA@bt.com>, mark wrote:
| Quote: |
The figures do however show clearly that theists have no moral advantage
over atheists.
Yes. I wouldn't fight to the death over these stats
|
For me, the real problem with those stats is that there is no control for
level of education. We know that there is a strong correlation between
level of education and atheism, likewise there is a strong negative
correlation between level of education and incarceration. So those stats
are probably largely explainable by level of education.
What I find most interesting is that various social ills (sexually
transmitted diseases, violent crimes, divorce, teen pregnancy) are all
well correlated with religiosity in prosperous democracies. The more
religious a country (or state in the US) is, the higher the rates of all
of these problems.
It is certainly clear that in the limited cases where there is evidence of
a relationship between atheism and ethical behaviour, it comes out in
favor of the the atheists. This, like all evidence, will have no impact
on ItIsDave, but it is worth noting.
This is hardly surprising. Someone who avoids unethical behaviour because
they fear punishment in an afterlife seems intrinsically less moral than a
person who avoids such behaviour because they feel that it is wrong.
After all, consider DILV's question about final judgment, but reverse it.
Would he live differently if he didn't live in fear of such judgment?
Cheers,
-j
--
Jeffrey Goldberg http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/
I rarely read top-posted, over-quoting or HTML postings.
http://improve-usenet.org/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|

76 Attacks blocked
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|